Rabu, 06 November 2013

Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

It will certainly believe when you are visiting choose this book. This inspiring Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, By Mary Morton, George Shackelford book can be reviewed totally in specific time depending upon just how commonly you open and also read them. One to keep in mind is that every e-book has their own manufacturing to get by each viewers. So, be the excellent reader and be a far better individual after reading this book Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, By Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford



Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Free Ebook PDF Online Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Though largely out of the public eye for more than a century, Gustave Caillebotte (1848–94) has come to be recognized as one of the most dynamic and original artists of the impressionist movement in Paris. His paintings are favorites of museum-goers, and recent restoration of his work has revealed more color, texture, and detail than was visible before while heightening interest in all of Caillebotte’s artwork. This lush companion volume to the National Gallery of Art’s major new exhibition, coorganized with the Kimbell Art Museum, explores the power and technical brilliance of his oeuvre. The book features fifty of Caillebotte’s strongest paintings, including post-conservation images of Paris Street; Rainy Day, along with The Floorscrapers and Pont de l’Europe, all of which date from a particularly fertile period between 1875 and 1882. The artist was criticized at the time for being too realistic and not impressionistic enough, but he was a pioneer in adopting the angled perspective of a modern camera to compose his scenes. Caillebotte’s skill and originality are evident even in the book’s reproductions, and the essays offer critical insights into his inspiration and subjects. This sumptuously illustrated publication makes clear why Caillebotte is among the most intriguing artists of nineteenth-century France, and it deepens our understanding of the history of impressionism.

Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #68393 in Books
  • Brand: Morton, Mary/ Shackelford, George
  • Published on: 2015-06-22
  • Original language: English
  • Number of items: 1
  • Dimensions: 12.00" h x 1.30" w x 9.50" l, .0 pounds
  • Binding: Hardcover
  • 272 pages
Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Review “A well-upholstered fauteuil of a book that readers can settle into. . . . Caillebotte is fascinating precisely because his style seemed, to his contemporaries, to be not style at all. It was ‘photographic’—not a term of praise in the 1870s, but a fundamental one for art a century on.” (Bookforum)“Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter’s Eye is the richly illustrated and impressively researched catalogue of an exhibition shown at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, and the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, TX.  Curators Mary Morton and George Shackelford establish once and for all the pivotal significance of Caillebotte’s often overlooked or downplayed paintings. The exhibition focused on the work Caillebotte showed with the Impressionists, dating from 1875 to the early 1880s. The catalogue demonstrates that although he was a friend of all the Impressionists, Caillebotte was closest to Edgar Degas in style and focus. Essays by the curators and other art historians spell out the rich intellectual, literary, cultural, and artistic contexts in which Caillebotte oriented himself in late-19th-century France.  Caillebotte, readers learn, was a keen observer of urban and suburban modernity. He rendered on canvas the psychological complexity of a French middle-class man’s experience of the new spaces and perspectives modern life afforded. Recommended.”   (Choice)

About the Author Mary Morton is curator and head of the Department of French Paintings at the National Gallery of Art. George Shackelford is senior deputy director at the Kimbell Art Museum in Fort Worth, Texas.


Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Where to Download Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Most helpful customer reviews

28 of 28 people found the following review helpful. Caillebotte's "Impressionist" Years By Kenneth Hughes This volume is the catalogue to accompany the exhibition of the same name at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., from June to October 2015 and then at the Kimbell Art Museum in Fort Worth, Texas, from November 2015 to February 2016. This is not the most comprehensive exhibition Caillebotte has had in the US (both the 1976 show organized by Kirk Varnedoe for Houston and Brooklyn and the 1994 retrospective in Paris, Chicago, and Los Angeles were larger), but in gathering fifty-seven canvases from the first half of the artist’s career, i.e., from around 1874 to the mid-1880’s, corresponding to the years of the Impressionist exhibitions, it has delineated more clearly than those previous shows what the curators call Caillebotte’s “Painter’s Eye,” i.e., the very individualistic and idiosyncratic vision that made his painting unlike that of any other artist of his generation and that created paintings of startling originality and striking modernity. John Rewald called Gustave Caillebotte a “timid” artist, and throughout all four editions of his groundbreaking and highly influential “History of Impressionism” steadfastly refused to see in him anything more than a kind of mini-Monet, a Sunday painter whose primary value to Impressionism was in paying Monet’s rent, buying up what Rewald considered otherwise “unsaleable” canvases of the “real” painters, helping to organize the exhibitions and generally bankrolling the movement. Given the information and the paintings that were available to Rewald by 1946, it is perhaps not hard to understand how he came to that opinion, for he seems to have seen mostly the landscape and nature studies from later in the artist’s life. But when one sees Caillebotte’s canvases of the Impressionist years, adjectives like “bold,” “daring,” and maybe even “fearless” suggest themselves; “timid” certainly does not come to mind. Neither, oddly, does “Impressionist,” and that may well have been Rewald’s sticking point, because only some of this work—and not the best at that—invites comparison with what we would generally consider an Impressionist style. Even though Renoir himself invited Caillebotte to join the second Impressionist exhibition in 1876, where he showed eight paintings, and though he continued to exhibit with the group, showing an additional fifty-nine paintings in four more exhibitions (missing only 1881 and the final one in 1886), and even though at times he was considered in the contemporary press to be the leader of the group, his paintings from these heyday years of Impressionism are visually distinct and quite divergent in theme, style, facture and just about every other way one can think of from “mainstream” Impressionism. Let’s give Rewald partial credit: maybe Caillebotte wasn’t a first-rate Impressionist painter after the scholar’s heart, but that doesn’t mean he was not a first-rate painter of another kind, and there was nothing “timid” about his art.The exhibition is curated and the catalogue edited by Mary Morton, head of the department of French painting at the National Gallery and George T. M. Shackelford, deputy director of the Kimbell. Their introduction points out some of the reasons why Caillebotte was so late to achieve the recognition that the other Impressionist painters enjoyed from the beginning. Chief among these is that since he did not need to earn money by selling his paintings, the vast majority of them were retained by the family after his death and still remain in private hands. (Even the Musée d’Orsay, which owns more of them than any other institution, has only four, compared to the dozens it has of each of his fellow Impressionists.) Combined with one part of the appended apparatus, an essay on his posthumous reputation from 1894 to 1994, there is some interesting observation on how an artistic reputation comes to be forged through strategic gallery sales, curatorial decisions, and other half-artistic/half-commercial factors. There are seven scholarly essays by academic and curatorial authorities, all clearly written and easily accessible. Some of the topics addressed are the artist’s “Deep Focus,” i.e., the extraordinary depth in some of his well-known paintings like “The Pont de l’Europe” (1876) and “Paris Street. Rainy Day” (1877), which the writer suggests is comparable to some early cinematic techniques; the surprisingly favorable way in which Caillebotte was viewed by much of the contemporary criticism, especially in comparison to the other painters; his interest in the furnishings of the bourgeois Parisian apartment as an indicator of social and interpersonal dysfunction; his rootedness in the realist tradition as transmitted to him through his teacher, Léon Bonnat (this is actually a short essay on Bonnat by the Orsay’s curator Stéphane Guégan); and the relationship of his paintings to contemporary photographic practice and techniques. In “Man in the Middle,” Dr. Shackelford himself makes a compelling argument that Caillebotte is best understood as occupying a middle ground between the two factions of Impressionism, i.e., between the painters of urban themes and modern life (like Degas) and the artists of atmosphere, landscape and light (Monet), and that his artistic evolution was from the former to the latter—unfortunately, as the writer concedes that Caillebotte was not a particularly inspired landscape painter and that in the second half of his short career, i.e., from the mid-1880’s to his early death in 1894, he made some fine paintings but “many more that are frankly rather ordinary” (16).The book itself is handsomely designed with an uncluttered layout and easily legible print, and it is profusely illustrated. The fifty-seven exhibition items are all reproduced full-page in the catalogue section, which is divided into several thematic areas (“View from the Window,” “Urban Interior,” “Observing the Nude,” etc.), each of which is introduced by a few pages of focussed discussion. The paintings are not individually commented on, but they all receive mention of some sort in the essays, which themselves have copious supportive illustrations including more of the artist’s paintings and some beautifully evocative photographs, some of these also printed full-page. The jacket text says there are 177 illustrations in all. One distinctive feature is the great number of detail studies, including over twenty-five full-bled pages, although I must say that it was not always clear to me why a particular detail was chosen for enlargement. Additional apparatus consists of a nicely illustrated “biographical chronology,” a good selected bibliography, an exhibition checklist with the requisite curatorial data, and an index of names and titles. There have not been very many Caillebotte exhibitions, which may be just as well; in their Introduction, the curators concede that out of a known oeuvre of around 500 paintings “only a fraction warrant the attention of a major exhibition” (16). But like the little girl with the little curl, when he was good, he was very, very good, and he is certainly very good in this exhibition and catalogue of his earlier work. Very warmly recommended to those interested in this period of French painting.

32 of 35 people found the following review helpful. A bronze book in a golden age By James We live in the golden age of book publishing. Never have reproductions been so clear, lifelike, and gorgeous. Good reproductions are borne from good photography, and unfortunately some of the photography in this book is absolutely abysmal. I went through the exhibition twice and compared the book to the paintings immediately after both trips. Some of the reproductions are fantastic (like the MFA's Bather or the Musee Dorsay's Floor Planers), but a number of them are absolutely abysmal and look like they were reproduced from film that was many generations down from the master--they look like the kind of muddy, dark, mushy images that I would expect to see in a mid-nineties budget book from Taschen or Dover. If I make another trip to the exhibition I'll do another comparison and update this review with some more notes about the reproductions of specific images.The layout is okay and only a few images are run through the gutter. If it weren't for the number of poor reproductions, I would've happily bought this book. As is, it's never going to find a home on my shelf--there are just too many crummy repros for me to justify paying $30 for it.

9 of 10 people found the following review helpful. The take-away from an interesting NGA exhibition By Blue in Washington I have mixed feelings about this book. As documentation for the National Gallery of Art's new exhibition of Caillebotte's work, it's a decent enough production--text rather good, layout good, illustrations okay. I just wish the curators/authors could have gone beyond the boundaries and numbers in the show. To be sure, the reader will understand that the painter's perspectives were probably "trained" as well as instinctive from the documentation in the book, but more substance could have made it even better.Caillebotte wasn't as prolific as his contemporaries (Monet, Renoir, Signac, etc.), but there were plenty of interesting paintings (maybe secondary in the view of art historians) not included in this exhibition, and therefore, not in the accompanying book. The iconic works are for the most part included, but this man is so interesting as a collector, facilitator, patron, designer and artist, that I would have liked to have seen more of his own works and perhaps a good bit of what he chose to collect from his impressionist contemporaries.

See all 14 customer reviews... Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford


Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford PDF
Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford iBooks
Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford ePub
Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford rtf
Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford AZW
Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford Kindle

Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford
Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye, by Mary Morton, George Shackelford

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar